The Effect of Learning Methods on Student Participation and Achievement in Chemistry Education
Keywords:
Chemistry, Learning activities, Learning methods, Learning outcomes, Student centered learningAbstract
This study analyzes the role of various instructional methods in enhancing student engagement and academic achievement in chemistry learning. The research employed a qualitative descriptive approach using a literature review design that examined findings from peer-reviewed journal articles, classroom action research, and educational reports. The synthesis of the reviewed studies indicates that student-centered instructional methods, particularly Project-Based Learning (PBL) and collaborative learning, consistently lead to higher levels of participation, conceptual comprehension, and overall learning outcomes. Meanwhile, teacher-centered lecture methods tend to result in lower engagement and weaker retention. The review also shows that combining multiple instructional strategies allows teachers to respond more effectively to differences in learners’ needs, characteristics, and learning objectives. The research concludes that blended instructional approaches that integrate project-based, collaborative, and reflective learning activities create more interactive and meaningful chemistry learning environments, while also supporting the development of essential twenty-first-century competencies.
References
Adlini, M. N., Dinda, A. H., Yulinda, S., Chotimah, O., & Merliyana, S. J. (2022). Metode penelitian kualitatif studi pustaka. Jurnal Edumaspul, 6(1), 974-980.
Al Abri, M. H., Al Aamri, A. Y., & Elhaj, A. M. A. (2024). Enhancing student learning experiences through integrated constructivist pedagogical models. European Journal of Contemporary Education and E-Learning, 2(1), 130-149. https://doi.org/10.59324/ejceel.2024.2(1).11
Aparicio, O. M., Ostos, O. L., & García, C. A. (2024). Convergence between emerging technologies and active methodologies in the university. JOTSE, 14(1), 31-44. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=9287835
Azizah, N., Wardani, I. B., & Fauzi, I. S. (2024). The Development of Biology Practicum Guidebook using Scientific Approach Based on Guided Inquiry for Senior High School Students. META: Journal of Science and Technological Education, 3(1), 1-12. https://meta.amiin.or.id/index.php/meta/article/view/90
Bhardwaj, V., Zhang, S., Tan, Y. Q., & Pandey, V. (2025, February). Redefining learning: student-centered strategies for academic and personal growth. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 10, p. 1518602). Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1518602
Byusa, E., Kampire, E., & Mwesigye, A. R. (2022). Game-based learning approach on students’ motivation and understanding of chemistry concepts: A systematic review of literature. Heliyon, 8(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09541
Chans, G. M., & Portuguez Castro, M. (2021). Gamification as a strategy to increase motivation and engagement in higher education chemistry students. Computers, 10(10), 132. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers10100132
Cong, D. H. (2025). Sustainable Development of High-Quality Human Resources. Revista Gestão & Tecnologia, 25(2), 287-315. https://doi.org/10.20397/2177-6652/2025.v25i2.3159
Dayal, P. D., & Ali-Chand, Z. (2022). Effective teaching and learning strategies in a chemistry classroom. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 57(2), 425-443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-022-00242-7
Dewi, F. F., Nasution, N. E. A., & Rizka, C. (2025). The effect of the make a match learning model assisted by picture card media on students' cognitive learning outcomes in the human respiratory system topic. Inornatus: Biology Education Journal, 5(1), 48-63. https://doi.org/10.30862/inornatus.v5i1.833
Ghafar, Z. N. (2023). The Teacher-centered and the student-centered: a comparison of two approaches. International Journal of Arts and Humanities, 1(1), 18-23. http://bluemarkpublishers.com/index.php/IJAH
Jowett, S., Warburton, V. E., Beaumont, L. C., & Felton, L. (2023). Teacher–Student relationship quality as a barometer of teaching and learning effectiveness: Conceptualization and measurement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 842-861. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12600
Karch, J. M., & Sevian, H. (2022). Development of a framework to capture abstraction in physical chemistry problem solving. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 23(1), 55-77. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1RP00119A
Kerimbayev, N., Umirzakova, Z., Shadiev, R., & Jotsov, V. (2023). A student-centered approach using modern technologies in distance learning: a systematic review of the literature. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00280-8
Kovalova, Y. (2025). Project-Based Learning in Online Education: Experience of Real Cases as a Means of Developing Professional Skills. European Journal of Interdisciplinary Issues, 2(1), 9-15. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15090375
Li, X., Bergin, C., & Olsen, A. A. (2022). Positive teacher-student relationships may lead to better teaching. Learning and Instruction, 80, 101581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101581
Mansour, N. (2024). Students’ and facilitators’ experiences with synchronous and asynchronous online dialogic discussions and e-facilitation in understanding the Nature of Science. Education and Information Technologies, 29(12), 15965-15997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12473-w
Musengimana, J., Kampire, E., & Ntawiha, P. (2021). Investigation of most commonly used instructional methods in teaching chemistry: Rwandan lower secondary schools. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(7), 241-261. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.7.14
Qureshi, M. A., Khaskheli, A., Qureshi, J. A., Raza, S. A., & Yousufi, S. Q. (2023). Factors affecting students’ learning performance through collaborative learning and engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(4), 2371-2391. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1884886
Omelianenko, O., & Artyukhova, N. (2024). Project-based learning: Theoretical overview and practical implications for local innovation-based development. Economics and Education, 9(1), 35-41. https://doi.org/10.30525/2500-946X/2024-1-6
Paethrangsi, N., Teekasap, S., & Khiewpan, R. (2024). Empowering students’ autonomous learning through self-regulation, metacognitive strategies, and collaborative learning environments. Journal of Liberal Arts RMUTT, 5(1), 69-79. https://doi.org/10.60101/jla.2024.5.1.4065
Pulatovna, K. K. (2024). Aspects of Developing the Ability for Independent Learning Among Students of Higner Educational Institutions. Web of Scientists and Scholars: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 2(12), 9-18. https://webofjournals.com/index.php/12/article/view/2417
Rohmah, S. A., Nasution, N. E. A., & Khotimah, K. (2025). The Effectiveness of an E-Booklet in Enhancing Scientific Explanation Skills on the Human Immune System Topic. META: Journal of Science and Technological Education, 4(1), 62-71. https://meta.amiin.or.id/index.php/meta/article/view/133
Salame, I. I., & Makki, J. (2021). Examining the use of PhEt simulations on students’ attitudes and learning in general chemistry II. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 17(4), e2247. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/10966
Sihombing, R. A., Muslim, M., Rahman, T., & Winarno, N. (2024). Enhancing Quality Education in Indonesia: A Literature Review of STEM-ESD Landscape Contributions. Journal of Science Learning, 7(3), 213-226. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1458500
Sya’adah, W., & Nurlim, R. (2025). The Correlation Between Students’ Comprehension of the Human Movement System and Their Attitudes Toward Maintaining Bone and Joint Health. META: Journal of Science and Technological Education, 4(1), 72-81. https://meta.amiin.or.id/index.php/meta/article/view/134
Tang, K. H. D. (2023). Student-centered approach in teaching and learning: What does it really mean?. Acta Pedagogia Asiana, 2(2), 72-83. https://doi.org/10.53623/apga.v2i2.218
Troussas, C., Giannakas, F., Sgouropoulou, C., & Voyiatzis, I. (2023). Collaborative activities recommendation based on students’ collaborative learning styles using ANN and WSM. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(1), 54-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1761835
Wati, E. S., Zaman, B., & Ramdani, C. (2024). Parents' Perception of Their Role in Character Education for Early Childhood in Indonesia. Jurnal Komunikasi Pendidikan, 8(2), 225-234. https://doi.org/10.32585/jurnalkomdik.v8i2.5226
Wibowo, S., Wangid, M. N., & Firdaus, F. M. (2025). The Relevance of Vygotsky's Constructivism Learning Theory with the Differentiated Learning Primary Schools. Journal of education and learning (EduLearn), 19(1), 431-440. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1456994
Tambak, S., Sukenti, D., Syarif, M., & Harahap, M. (2024). Development of Madrasah Teacher Leadership Competency: Involving Project-Based Learning Methods in Students-Centered Learning. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 14(3), 243-255. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.14.03.23
Zeng, H., & Luo, J. (2024). Effectiveness of synchronous and asynchronous online learning: a meta-analysis. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(8), 4297-4313. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2197953
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 META: Journal of Science and Technological Education

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.




