Analysis of Conceptual Understanding of Tenth-Grade Science Students on the Topic of Viruses Based on Learning Styles at MA Raudlatus Syabab Jember

Fajar Fatoni; Nanda Eska Anugrah Nasution; Iwan

Authors

Fajar Fatoni UIN Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember
Nanda Eska Anugrah Nasution UIN Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember
Iwan Universitas Papua

Keywords:

Conceptual understanding, Science students, Viruses, Learning styles

Abstract

Conceptual understanding is a critical aspect of learning, particularly in biology, where students must grasp complex and abstract concepts. This study investigates the relationship between students' learning styles and their comprehension of the topic of viruses in a tenth-grade science class at MA Raudlatus Syabab Jember during the 2023/2024 academic year. A qualitative descriptive approach was employed, utilizing questionnaires, observations, and interviews to gather data from 34 students and their biology teacher. The findings indicate that visual learners exhibit strong comprehension when using images, diagrams, and structured notes; auditory learners perform better when engaging in discussions and listening to verbal explanations; and kinesthetic learners achieve deeper understanding through hands-on activities and practical demonstrations. However, each learning style presents unique challenges that can hinder comprehension if instructional methods are not aligned with students’ preferences. The study highlights the necessity of incorporating multimodal teaching strategies to cater to diverse learning styles, ensuring more effective knowledge retention and academic success.

References

Abualhaija, N. (2019). Using constructivism and student-centered learning approaches in nursing education. International Journal of Nursing and Health Care Research, 5(7), 1-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.29011/IJNHR-093.100093

Alabi, M. (2024). Visual Learning: The Power of Visual Aids and Multimedia. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385662029_Visual_Learning_The_Power_of_Visual_Aids_and_Multimedia

Ananda, R., & Hayati, F. (2020). Variabel belajar (kompilasi konsep).

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Complete Edition. New York: Longman.

Anggoro, B. S., Puspita, N., Pratiwi, D. D., Agustina, S., Komala, R., Widyastuti, R., & Widyawati, S. (2021). Mathematical-analytical thinking skills: The impacts and interactions of open-ended learning method & self-awareness (Its application on bilingual Test instruments). Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(1), 89-107. https://dx.doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v12i1.8516

Astuti, L. S. (2017). Penguasaan konsep IPA ditinjau dari konsep diri dan minat belajar siswa. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 7(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v7i1.1293

Becker, L. B., Welter, V. D. E., Aschermann, E., & Großschedl, J. (2021). Comprehension-oriented learning of cell biology: Do different training conditions affect students’ learning success differentially?. Education Sciences, 11(8), 438. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080438

Bezo, B., & Hala, M. (2021). Analysis on the use of different techniques based on three learning styles: visual, listening, and kinesthetic. Polis. https://doi.org/10.58944/jlun7100

Blessing, A. I., Ola, A., & Owen, W. (2024). Challenges of Kinesthetic Learning: Identify potential obstacles kinesthetic learners may face in traditional classroom settings.

De Porter, B. (2019). Quantum Learning; Membiasakan Belajar Nyaman dan Menyenangkan. Kaifa.

Doyle, L., McCabe, C., Keogh, B., Brady, A., & McCann, M. (2020). An overview of the qualitative descriptive design within nursing research. Journal of research in nursing, 25(5), 443-455. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987119880234

Efendi, M., Asha, L., & Wanto, D. (2024). Mengurai Tantangan Manajemen Mutu Pendidikan Madrasah: Tinjauan Dari Input-Proses-Output. Educational Leadership: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 3(2), 240-254. http://dx.doi.org/10.24252/edu.v3i2.43721

Faridli, E. M., Abidin, N., Sutama, S., Sutopo, A., & Murtiyasa, B. (2024). Tantangan menuju pendidikan unggul: membangkitkan produktivitas institusi pendidikan untuk kualitas pendidikan yang lebih baik di Indonesia. Jurnal EDUCATIO: Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 10(1), 186-193. http://dx.doi.org/10.29210/1202423797

Karina, M., Judijanto, L., Rukmini, A., Fauzi, M. S., & Arsyad, M. (2024). Pengaruh Interaksi Sosial Terhadap Prestasi Akademik: Tinjauan Literatur Pada Pembelajaran Kolaboratif. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 4(5), 6334-6343. https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v4i5.15351

Kuzminov, Y., Sorokin, P., & Froumin, I. (2019). Generic and specific skills as components of human capital: new challenges for education theory and practice. Форсайт, 13(2 (eng)), 19-41.

Leonidova, G. V. (2019). Human potential formation of children in the system of general education. Ekonomicheskie i Sotsialnye Peremeny, (63), 172-188A. https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2019.3.63.11

Mendrofa, K. J., Wau, M., & Waruwu, Y. (2023). Pendidikan jendela dunia. Jurnal Visi Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 4(2), 69-77. https://doi.org/10.51622/pengabdian.v4i2.1350

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Nasution, N. E. A., & Rizka, C. (2024). Investigating University Student’s Acceptance of Virtual and Remote Labs in Their Learning. Lentera Pendidikan : Jurnal Ilmu Tarbiyah Dan Keguruan, 27(1), 47-62. https://doi.org/10.24252/lp.2024v27n1i4

Nasution, N.E.A., Al Muhdhar, M.H.I., Sari, M.S., & Balqis. (2023). Relationship between Critical and Creative Thinking Skills and Learning Achievement in Biology with Reference to Educational Level and Gender. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 20(1), 66-83. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2023.005

Nasution, N. E. A., Putri, M. U., & Rizka, C. (2023). Analysis of Students' Learning Styles in Biology Subjects at Madrasah Aliyah Raudlatus Syabab Sukowono Jember. Pedagogi Hayati, 7(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.31629/ph.v7i1.6758

Noor, N., & Dahyati, A. (2023, August). Membangun Kemandirian Anak Usia Dini Melalui Pendidikan Kecakapan Hidup di Lingkungan Keluarga. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Non Formal (Vol. 1). https://ejournal.untirta.ac.id/SNPNF/article/view/43/29

Noviyani, M., Kusairi, S., & Amin, M. (2017). Penguasan konsep dan kemampuan berargumentasi siswa smp pada pembelajaran ipa dengan inkuiri berbasis argumen (Doctoral dissertation, State University of Malang).

Oladele, O. K., & Mccall, A. (2024). Auditory Learning: The Importance of Verbal Instruction and Discussion.

Oladele, O. K. (2024). Kinesthetic Learning: Hands-On Learning and Active Engagement.

Prasetiyo, M. B., & Rosy, B. (2021). Model pembelajaran inkuiri sebagai strategi mengembangkan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Administrasi Perkantoran (JPAP), 9(1), 109-120. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpap.v9n1.p109-120

Saâ, H. (2018). Manajemen mutu pendidikan dalam meningkatkan sumber daya manusia. Bidayatuna Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Mandrasah Ibtidaiyah, 1(2), 183-204. https://doi.org/10.36835/bidayatuna.v1i2.329

Schleicher, A. (2019). PISA 2018: Insights and interpretations. OECD Publishing.

Sugiyono, D. (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D.

Tahir, W. (2017). Pengembangan manajemen sumber daya manusia terhadap peningkatan mutu pendidikan. Inspiratif Pendidikan, 6(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.24252/ip.v6i1.3578

Taylor, S. J., Bogdan, R., & DeVault, M. L. (2015). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394260485

Wahab, I., & Nuraeni, N. (2020). The Analysis of Students’learning Style. Seltics Journal: Scope of English Language Teaching Literature and Linguistics, 3(1), 41-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.46918/seltics.v3i1.509

Zajda, J., & Zajda, J. (2021). Constructivist learning theory and creating effective learning environments. Globalisation and education reforms: Creating effective learning environments, 35-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71575-5_3